Magneti pe alimentare carburant

ECU baga aceeasi motorina cu sau fara cucurele de booster. Dupa cit aer simte debitmetrul, temperatura motor si pozitie pedala atita baga ! Mai stiu eu unul care punea tot felul de rahaturi in rezervor si se minuna ca isi fac treaba si scade consumul...el avea debitmetrul supermurdar si valoarea raportata de el era mult mai mica decit cea reala...normal ca ECU baga mai putina motorina dar nici nu tragea motorul.
Eu zic sa nu mai aruncati banii pe timpenii sau sa puna careva bot la tot ce scrie pe ambalaje. Ma mir ca OPC-ul nu s-a sesizat inca. Oare au prostiile astea si certificare RAR .

Magnetic Fuel treatments
Status : Untested
Websites : too many to list.
If you drive a car, you're absolutely guaranteed to have heard this claim before : "put a magnet on the fuel line and it will increase your fuel economy by making the fuel burn more efficiently." Excuse my English, but that's bollocks. There's so many reasons that these devices are pure fantasy. Here's just a few of them:

The magnets are tiny, and pretty weak. There's no demonstrable effect of these things on hydrocarbon liquids such as gasoline (petrol) or diesel. A magnet cannot provide oxygen and neither can it change the amount of heat released from burning the fuel.
Liquids cannot "retain" any magnetic effect when they leave the magnet, even if affected when within it. Hence you cannot "charge up" a liquid in the way that a dust particle can be charged.
There is no truly independent lab analysis which could give evidence that combustion can be improved nor that you'll get better power output or lower emissions. The "labs" that give reports and testimonials to the various magnetic product companies are either on their payroll, or received generous "donations". No conflict of interest there then.
A modern car engine will typically fail to completely burn something like ½% of the fuel it uses. This therefore will be the sort of improvement that could be expected by a device that ensured "complete combustion" of all the fuel. Most magnetic devices claim an 8-10% improvement. What are they burning above the ½% of unburned fuel?
Scientific doublespeak
As with the holographic plastic sticker above, the websites, TV commercials and brochures of these magnetic devices use scientific doublespeak to try to impress / confuse the consumer. A great example is this site : The Magnetizer. According to their site, their device works by:

breaking up [nonexistent] "clusters" of hydrocarbon molecules, thereby exposing the previously-shielded atoms to combustion
converting the hydrocarbons to "positive ions" which are more strongly attracted to the "negatively charged air molecules" (assuming that you also install their "air energizer" on the air intake)
change the hydrocarbon molecule from its para [spin] state to the higher energized ortho state
Yes folks, The Magnetizer's manufacturers would have you believe they can magnetise thin air by clamping a weak magnet around your air intake. Amazing.


Sursa : http://www.carbibles.com/ , Chris nu e prostu' satului ....

Care doreste ii fac eu tiripleasca aia, am magneti foarte puternici din HDD , pret imbatabil, 50lei.

Maiandrei sti de unde ar putea fi problema de imi arata mie la releti 1.7-1.8l consumul instantaneu?aia de la reprezentanta au spus ca asa tre sa arate, chiar nu inteleg.

http://www.fuelmax.ro/
Nu stiam unde sa postez... Mi se pare destul de interesant, dar oare poate fi adevarat?
http://stirileprotv.ro/stir...ent-sau-gaze.html
Eu nu ma pricep si chiar sunt curios daca se poate face asa ceva si nu sau gandit pana acum marii producatori auto si sa vina cu 10 jucarioare din astea sa scoata un consum dragut la motoare de multi litri. Daca este cineva care ma poate lumina ii multumesc!
P.S. Rog moderatorii sa mute discutia unde trebuie daca nu am scris unde trebuie.

O seara excelenta!

Uite aici economie de combustibil Primul Oltcit electric omologat de RAR! Se aude putin fluieratul electomotorului ....dar mai tare se aude scartaitul bucsilor! Bravo lor!

ai fi mirat dar s-a montat.exista pe c20ne.am vazut cateva in realitate.nu stiu rolul dar magnet era sigur.

Din biblie http://www.carbibles.com/fu...ne_bible_pg6.html , traducere google ca sunt unii mai slabi la engleza :


Subiectul a mai fost discutat pe forum la fel si turbioane, aditivi minune, filtru minune, turbina electrica etc. , il voi uni cand gasesc discutia veche.

wtf? tu ai vazut consumu instant la vreo masina pana acum? in filmulet ii apare 3.7-3.8-6.8 . consumu variaza de la 0-99% la vag in functie de cum apesi pedala de acceleratie si clar el o apasa mult mai putin decat trebuia si in momentul cand a calcat-o putin mai mult a crescut la 6.8 si garantat crestea mai mult daca mai filmau bc-ul

Din cauza asta evit sa comentez, pentru a nu intra in polemici stupide. Da, am vazut consumul instant al multor masini, indiferent ca imi apartineau sau erau masini de servici. Si da, stiu cum variaza consumul instant la masini, si da, mi se pare dragut un consum intre 3 si 6% pentru un audi a6 automat la 100km/h. La zafira aveam 6% la 100km/h pe pilot... In concluzie te rog sa vi cu argumente sau pareri personale fara sa jignesti si sa pastram o limita de bun simt.
Multumesc.[/quote]

o sa iti filmez de l amine sa vezi la 150 la ora cum sco 1%

la viteza aia daca o scoti din viteza iti arata un 2-3% . ideea e ca pt 4-5 secunde poti afisa un consum bun pe bc (fara ambreiaj sau scos din viteze ca atunci e tot mare, mai ales ca avea automata pe audi) numai din pedala de acceleratie, iar in filmulet soferul nu a reusit asta pt ca a tinut pedala mai putin apasata, apoi a inceput sa o apese si bc-ul merge in hopuri dar sunt convins ca pe afisaj a aparut intr-un final un 8-9%